ArticleScientific reports2026
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant spike protein maintains the ability to bind and activate human platelets: Comparison with the wild-type.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ongoing mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contribute to the persistence of COVID-19. While the wild-type (WT) spike protein enhances platelet activity, the effects of the Omicron variant remain unclear. This study compared the effects of WT and Omicron spike proteins on platelet function in 10 healthy participants. We evaluated spike protein binding, P-selectin (platelet activation marker) expression, and aggregability using the Friedman test and Dunn’s post-hoc test. Results showed that both WT and Omicron spike proteins significantly increased binding to platelets and enhanced ADP-induced P-selectin expression compared to the control. However, neither protein significantly affected P-selectin expression under basal conditions or aggregation under low-dose (2 µM) ADP stimulation. Notably, under SFLLRN stimulation, only the Omicron variant significantly increased aggregation compared to the control, while the WT did not. No significant differences were observed between WT and Omicron across all assays. These findings suggest that the Omicron variant maintains a potent ability to modulate platelet reactivity, particularly through specific signaling pathways, despite numerous mutations. The qualitative nature of the spike protein-platelet interaction may play a crucial role in activation, highlighting the persistent prothrombotic risk across SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.