Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Changes in visuocortical engagement and oscillatory brain activity during associative learning.

Sarah M Gardy, Christian Panitz, Hannah Engle, Faith Gilbert, Andreas Keil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M GardyDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. sgardy@ufl.edu.
Christian PanitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Hannah EngleDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Faith GilbertDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Andreas KeilDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS #R01MH125615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aversive conditioning produces selectively heightened visuocortical responses to conditioned stimuli (CS) that predict aversive unconditioned events (US). However, it is unclear whether these responses are unique to aversive conditioning or if similar neural signatures emerge when a CS predicts a neutral event. To address this question, we paired a soft tone with one of two oriented circular gratings (CS+; counterbalanced), while two intermediate orientations were never paired with the neutral tone, serving as generalization stimuli (GS). Twenty-two participants viewed gratings for 3000 ms, with the tone presented during the last 1000 ms of the CS+. Gratings were flickered at a rate of 15 Hz to evoke steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials (ssVEPs), a metric of visuocortical engagement. Time-frequency decomposition quantified changes in alpha-band (8–13 Hz) spectral amplitude — another electrophysiological index of aversive conditioning. Contrary to findings observed during aversive conditioning, alpha amplitude increased, rather than decreased, during CS+ trials relative to GSs. ssVEP amplitude was higher for GSs than for the CS+ — opposite to findings in aversive conditioning. Thus, a CS paired with non-aversive outcomes engaged mechanisms consistent with working memory, anticipation, or imagery processes, reflected in heightened alpha amplitude and attenuated ssVEP, rather than the defensive potentiation observed during aversive conditioning.

Indexed as

Association LearningEvoked Potentials, VisualVisual CortexAdultConditioning, ClassicalElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultAlphaAssociation formationEEGPavlovian ConditioningssVEP

Identifiers

PMID41957439
PMCPMC13223303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.