ArticleScientific reports2026
Sensitivity of current Tropilaelaps mercedesae monitoring methods in Apis mellifera colonies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of methods for early detection of Tropilaelaps mites in European honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The parasitic mite Tropilaelaps mercedesae (Anderson & Morgan) has recently been confirmed in western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in western Asia and eastern Europe, marking a range expansion that necessitates effective monitoring methods to rapidly detect introductions into new regions, as well as promote integrated pest management where it is established. This study compared the sensitivity of current T. mercedesae monitoring methods, using the nearly globally distributed A. mellifera parasitic mite Varroa destructor (Anderson & Trueman) for comparison. Methods tested were bottom board sticky trap, worker brood cell uncapping, brood frame bump test, alcohol wash, and powdered sugar shake. Additionally, detection thresholds (cf. ED
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.