ArticleScientific reports2026
Hand use predicts mental rotation ability in a sex-specific manner.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hands-on interactions provide a fundamental bridge between action and cognition, offering sensorimotor information that shapes how humans perceive and mentally represent their world. To directly probe this relationship, we used a naturalistic task in which patterns of hand use were measured as participants (N = 65; 37 females) reached for and grasped toy bricks to construct replicas of a model that varied in spatial complexity, requiring either low or high levels of mental rotation (MR). Participants also completed the gold-standard test of MR ability (MRT). Because spatial abilities such as MR are predominantly right-hemisphere lateralized, we predicted increased left-hand use (controlled by the right hemisphere) when grasping toy bricks in models with high MR demands. The results confirmed this prediction, but only in males; males increased left-hand use under higher MR demands. Exploratory analyses further revealed that, specifically in younger males, this behavioural shift predicted MRT performance, indicating stronger right-hemisphere specialization and tighter action–cognition integration. Together, these findings demonstrate that a fundamental sensorimotor behaviour such as grasping provides a window into spatial–cognitive processing, with patterns of hand use reflecting hemispheric specialization and predicting individual differences in MR ability, providing direct evidence thereof.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.