ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of particle size and moisture on respirable coal dust generation in pakistan's informal bituminous mines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respirable coal dust remains a major occupational hazard in informal mining operations in Pakistan, where high-ash, low-moisture bituminous coals are handled without engineered dust-control systems. This study evaluates how particle size distribution (PSD), moisture content, and surface wettability influence dust-generation potential in coal from the Darra Adam Khel coalfield. Laboratory analyses were conducted on three particle-size fractions (> 75 μm, 45–75 μm, and < 45 μm) to measure moisture retention, slurry pH, and contact-angle–based wettability under ambient conditions. Results show a size-dependent response, with ultrafine particles (< 45 μm) retaining the highest moisture (up to 6.60%) and exhibiting near-neutral pH (6.7), indicating increased carbonate dissolution. Contact angles ranged from 72° to 109°, confirming moderate–strong hydrophobicity that intensified upon compaction. Because dust-generation chamber tests were not available, respirable dust-suppression efficiency (35–58%) was estimated from established Pakistani benchmarks rather than measured directly. The study also acknowledges that the hypothesized 8% moisture threshold for optimal suppression could not be experimentally validated, as the maximum achievable sample moisture was 6.60%. High-pressure gas-atmosphere wettability trends (He, N₂, CO₂) referenced in the discussion represent conceptual mechanisms from published literature, not in-house experimental data. Overall, the findings indicate that Darra Adam Khel coal exhibits limited natural wettability and low moisture-holding capacity, providing a physicochemical basis for enhanced dust-control strategies such as pH conditioning and nonionic surfactants to address hydrophobic surface behavior in semi-arid mining environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.