Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Speech perception consistency facilitates initial lexical activation, but not speech perception flexibility.

Brian W L Wong, Arthur G Samuel, Efthymia C Kapnoula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian W L WongBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain. bwong@bcbl.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-6116
Arthur G SamuelBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-2710
Efthymia C KapnoulaBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6640-1948

Funding

European Social Fund Plus RYC2022-035505-IMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación # PID2020-113348GB-I00 and # PID2023-146423NB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PRE2021-097223Ramón y Cajal Program MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech perception consistency refers to the similarity between a listener’s responses to repeated presentations of the same speech sound (e.g., along a /ba/–/pa/ continuum). Although research has demonstrated multiple advantages of consistency, its role in initial lexical activation (i.e., early activation of word candidates) and speech perception flexibility (e.g., the ability to recover from misleading speech input) has not been tested. We investigated the role of consistency in spoken-word recognition among Spanish (L1)–English (L2) bilingual listeners. Focusing on the bilabial stop contrast (/b/–/p/), consistency was measured in a task where participants repeatedly rated speech sounds on a continuous scale (Visual Analog Scale), whereas initial lexical activation and speech perception flexibility were assessed using a word-to-picture matching task with eye-tracking (Visual World Paradigm). Seventy Spanish–English bilinguals completed these tasks in both languages. Listeners with higher consistency exhibited stronger initial lexical activation for acoustically compatible word candidates across /b/ and /p/ in L1 Spanish and for /p/ in L2 English. However, consistency was not associated with speech perception flexibility. These findings suggest that speech perception consistency primarily supports early lexical activation during spoken-word recognition, while playing a more limited role in later processes involved in revising initial misinterpretations.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMultilingualismPhoneticsYoung AdultConsistencyIndividual differencesLexical activationSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID41957410
PMCPMC13201790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.