ArticleScientific reports2026
Speech perception consistency facilitates initial lexical activation, but not speech perception flexibility.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech perception consistency refers to the similarity between a listener’s responses to repeated presentations of the same speech sound (e.g., along a /ba/–/pa/ continuum). Although research has demonstrated multiple advantages of consistency, its role in initial lexical activation (i.e., early activation of word candidates) and speech perception flexibility (e.g., the ability to recover from misleading speech input) has not been tested. We investigated the role of consistency in spoken-word recognition among Spanish (L1)–English (L2) bilingual listeners. Focusing on the bilabial stop contrast (/b/–/p/), consistency was measured in a task where participants repeatedly rated speech sounds on a continuous scale (Visual Analog Scale), whereas initial lexical activation and speech perception flexibility were assessed using a word-to-picture matching task with eye-tracking (Visual World Paradigm). Seventy Spanish–English bilinguals completed these tasks in both languages. Listeners with higher consistency exhibited stronger initial lexical activation for acoustically compatible word candidates across /b/ and /p/ in L1 Spanish and for /p/ in L2 English. However, consistency was not associated with speech perception flexibility. These findings suggest that speech perception consistency primarily supports early lexical activation during spoken-word recognition, while playing a more limited role in later processes involved in revising initial misinterpretations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.