ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of landslide hazard under specific rainfall scenarios based on a hybrid CNN-TRIGRS and matrix approach: a case study of Meishan Town, Zhejiang Province, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a frequent and devastating global geological hazard, landslides pose significant threats to communities, infrastructure, and the environment. The study area in Meishan Town, China, is particularly susceptible to rainfall-induced landslides due to frequent typhoons and rainstorms. This study proposes a novel hybrid framework that integrates a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with the TRIGRS physical model for landslide hazard assessment under four rainfall scenarios. The core innovation is a transparent and interpretable matrix-based coupling method that combines a CNN-derived landslide susceptibility index with the Factor of Safety (Fs) computed by TRIGRS, enabling a more comprehensive hazard zonation. To address the prevalent issue of imbalanced data in landslide inventories, we optimized the CNN training by comparing SMOTE-TL and RUS sampling strategies, finding SMOTE-TL significantly superior (AUC: 0.87 vs. 0.83). Our approach, which does not require extensive pre-failure rainfall data, produces hazard maps that are strongly consistent with the historical landslide inventory. This study provides an efficient and practical solution for landslide hazard assessment, particularly in data-scarce regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.