Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957368›Full record

Articlenpj aging2026

Correlation between frailty status, surgical access, and outcomes in older adults with valvular heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery.

Paolo Cimaglia, Elisa Mikus, Michele Trichilo, Elisabetta Tonet, Mariafrancesca Fiorentino, Diego Sangiorgi, Simona Brogneri, Jacopo Bonini, Chiara Bianchi, Alberto Sarti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Paolo Cimaglia *Cardiovascular Institute, University-Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Elisa Mikus *Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.
Michele TrichiloCardiovascular Institute, University-Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Elisabetta TonetCardiovascular Institute, University-Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Mariafrancesca FiorentinoCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.
Diego SangiorgiCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy. dsangiorgi@gvmnet.it.
Simona BrogneriCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.
Jacopo BoniniCardiovascular Institute, University-Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Chiara BianchiCardiovascular Institute, University-Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Alberto SartiCardiovascular Institute, University-Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Elena TremoliCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.
Carlo SaviniCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is not routinely assessed nor incorporated into the Euroscore II, and evidence on minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in older frail adults remains limited. We evaluated whether frailty assessment improves the prognostic performance of the Euroscore II and whether MICS provides benefits in frail patients. Patients aged ≥70 years undergoing valve surgery were assessed for frailty preoperatively. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 year; the secondary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. A total of 568 patients were included (median age 76 years; median Euroscore II 2.3); 65.3% underwent elective surgery, and 63.4% MICS. For the primary endpoint, the Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) provided the greatest improvement when added to Euroscore II (Harrell's C + 0.054, p < 0.05), followed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (+0.013, p < 0.05). For mortality, EFS showed the largest gain (+0.057, p < 0.05), followed by the Essential Frailty Toolset (+0.011, p < 0.05). In frail patients, MICS was protective for mortality but not for the composite endpoint. Frailty assessment, particularly EFS, improves risk stratification, and MICS may reduce mortality in frail older adults.

Identifiers

PMID41957368
PMCPMC13249931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.