ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Estimating age in elderly individuals: a morphological and quantitative approach using the pubic symphysis.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating age in elderly adults is particularly challenging in forensic anthropology due to accelerated skeletal degeneration that varies greatly among individuals and the reduced precision of existing methods for advanced age groups. This study examines eight pubic symphyseal features in 228 documented individuals aged 60 or older from contemporary skeletal collections in Portugal and Spain, and incorporates pubic bone weight to evaluate its relationship with increasing age. Regression tree analysis identified two late-adult phases (Phases 1 and 2), which align with refined versions of the Suchey–Brooks, Hartnett, and Berg Phases VI and VII. The method demonstrated strong intra- and interobserver reliability (ρ = 0.77–0.97 and ρ = 0.58–0.75), minimal bias (− 4.75 to + 3.12), and acceptable inaccuracy (1.78–8.12 years). Pelvic bone weight showed a moderate negative correlation with age (ρ = −0.44, p < 0.01), and no significant bilateral differences or effects from hip prostheses were observed. This refined method provides a reproducible approach for estimating age in elderly individuals, improving overall accuracy and applicability. Further validation with additional samples from other populations is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.