ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Forensic life-threat assessments using trauma scoring in single stabs to the trunk.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionForensic assessments of whether an injury would have been life-threatening often rely on empirical knowledge rather than evidence-based criteria. To address this gap, we applied the validated trauma scoring system New Injury Severity Score (NISS) to estimate mortality risk along the natural course of single stab injuries to the trunk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 408 survivors and 139 fatalities with single stab injuries to the trunk, using data from registries maintained by the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine. Organ and vessel damage in survivors, stratified by intervention complexity; and fatalities, stratified by time until death, were presented. The predictive performance of NISS was estimated using logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsNISS was strongly associated with intervention complexity among survivors and demonstrated excellent performance in predicting fatal outcomes without lifesaving treatment (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92–0.96), with optimal discrimination at NISS ≥ 20 (Youden’s Index = 0.72). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionTo increase the evidence base in forensic life-threat assessment, we suggest applying NISS as a complement to the expert opinion, as it offers potential for establishing a transparent and systematic tool that increases the rule of law. However, the tool needs to be validated in other settings and for multiple injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.