Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957277›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Dynamic competition between bottom-up saliency and top-down goals in early visual cortex.

Dan Wang, Kabir Arora, Jan Theeuwes, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Surya Gayet, Samson Chota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan WangDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. wangdanmails@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2318-1348
Kabir AroraDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jan TheeuwesDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stefan Van der StigchelDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Surya Gayet *Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-1272
Samson Chota *Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 202308510050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task-irrelevant yet salient stimuli can elicit automatic, bottom-up attentional capture and compete with top-down, goal-directed processes for neural representation. However, the temporal dynamics underlying this competition, and how they influence early visual processing, remain poorly understood. Here, we combine electroencephalography with Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) to non-invasively and simultaneously track early visual responses to target and distractor. Both target and distractor evoke stronger initial RIFT responses than nontarget, reflecting top-down and bottom-up attentional effects on early visual processing. Importantly, the presence of a distractor attenuates the initial RIFT response to the target, reflecting competition during the initial stages of visual processing. RIFT responses to the distractor eventually decrease below responses to the target and nontarget, representing active suppression of task-irrelevant stimuli. We show that the dynamic interplay between top-down control and bottom-up saliency directly impacts early visual responses, thereby illuminating a complete timeline of attentional competition in visual cortex.

Indexed as

AttentionGoalsVisual CortexVisual PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41957277
PMCPMC13249964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.