ArticleScientific reports2026
The effects of the menstrual cycle on physical and psychological parameters in female athletes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarkers of exercise-induced muscle damage and inflammation across menstrual cycle phases: a critical review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle may influence physical performance and psychological well-being in female athletes. However, current evidence remains heterogeneous, partly due to inconsistent cycle phase determination and task-dependent outcome measures. This study aimed to describe phase-dependent changes in physical and psychological parameters across six hormonally validated menstrual cycle phases and to examine associations between these domains. Eighteen eumenorrheic female athletes from various sports (age 18-30 years; 23.6 ± 3.8 years) were assessed across six menstrual cycle phases. Dynamic maximal strength in the half squat, isometric handgrip strength, and psychological variables including POMS subscales, motivation, sleep quality, and perceived exertion were measured. Significant phase effects were observed for half-squat performance, isometric handgrip strength, and several POMS subscales. Main effect p values ranged from p = .029 to p < .001, with partial eta-squared effect sizes between η²p = .13 and 0.98. Half-squat performance peaked in the late follicular phase and at ovulation and was lowest in the late luteal phase. Handgrip strength reached its highest values during the late luteal phase. Psychological measures showed increased fatigue and depression scores and reduced vigor in the late luteal phase. No phase effects were found for motivation, sleep quality, or perceived exertion (p = .424-0.698). At the individual level, half-squat performance was negatively associated with POMS depression scores (r = - .60, p = .009). All other correlations were non-significant, with r values ranging from - 0.44 to - 0.47 and p values between 0.052 and 0.849. A pattern-oriented and individually adaptive training approach is recommended, including the development of menstrual cycle literacy among athletes and support staff. A monitoring strategy using a small number of informative strength and well-being markers, combined with regular feedback, may help adjust training loads to individual menstrual cycle patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.