ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Infant Breathing and Bedding Characteristics: Objective Tests for Evaluating Their Relationship.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bedding characteristics have been associated with an increased risk of respiratory impairment and sudden infant death. However, the relevant bedding properties and the mechanisms influencing newborn respiration remain poorly understood. Existing evidence is fragmented across epidemiological, clinical, forensic, and regulatory studies, with limited integration of respiratory physiology and engineering-based measurement frameworks. Consequently, current safety guidelines rely largely on qualitative criteria and simplified mechanical tests that may not adequately capture physiologically relevant risks. This review examines the available literature investigating potential mechanisms through which bedding characteristics may influence infant breathing, identifies possible relevant bedding properties, and critically evaluates the testing methods proposed to assess these properties. By synthesizing evidence across disciplines, we highlight key knowledge gaps and misalignments between current testing approaches and the underlying biomechanical and physiological determinants of respiratory compromise. Carefully designed future in-vivo and in-vitro studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms and more precisely identify hazardous bedding characteristics. In particular, stronger interdisciplinary integration and the development of advanced biomechanical in-vitro models that more accurately reproduce infant respiratory function are essential. This integrative framework aims to support evidence-based bedding design and inform future regulatory standards to enhance infant safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41957257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.