ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2026
Long-Term Management of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), characterised by polypoidal lesions. Prevalence data indicate that PCV is more common in people of Asian ethnicity, although it also occurs in non-Asian individuals. However, because of a lack of globally agreed diagnostic criteria and routine screening programmes, PCV is likely to be under-diagnosed in some populations. Recent consensus suggests that PCV is a form of type 1 macular neovascularisation and should be classified as a subtype of nAMD. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy has demonstrated short-term efficacy in terms of visual acuity in PCV, and outcomes may be further improved by combining anti-VEGF therapy with photodynamic therapy. However, data on the long-term (≥ 5 years) efficacy of these treatments are limited and often conflicting. Although some people with PCV can achieve long-term remission following initial treatment (21.7-51.5%), eventual lesion reactivation is reported for approximately four-fifths of patients (81.3%). The socioeconomic impact of long-term PCV management could be reduced by identifying and characterising the subpopulations least likely to require chronic treatment. Large, global, randomised, placebo-controlled studies with long-term follow-up periods are needed in addition to real-world evidence to allow clinicians to reliably stratify people with PCV and support the stopping of anti-VEGF therapy in people at low risk of disease reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.