ArticleScientific reports2026
Processing of abstract regularities in the human brain during dichotic listening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mismatch-negativity (MMN) component reflects automatic brain mechanisms encoding regularities in the auditory environment and detecting violations in them. Tone series, either descending or ascending in pitch, were used as stimuli. Occasional deviant stimuli (e.g., an ascending tone interspersed among descending tones) violated these regularities. The participants were presented either with a single descending binaural tone stream (identical input to both ears) or simultaneously with two different streams, an ascending stream to the left ear and a descending stream to the right ear. The effects of attention on the MMN were investigated by instructing the participants either to ignore the auditory stimuli or to detect the deviants in the designated ear. In the ignore conditions, the deviants in both the one-stream and two-stream conditions elicited the MMN. However, during the detection task, only the deviants presented in the attended ear elicited the MMN. The results demonstrate that the brain can encode opposite regularities from two simultaneously presented stimulus streams even when the participant’s attention is directed to another modality. However, the brain processes are not completely attention independent, as demonstrated by the lack of MMN to unattended-ear deviants when attention was firmly focused within the auditory modality to the other ear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.