Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957245›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Processing of abstract regularities in the human brain during dichotic listening.

Petri Paavilainen, Leevi Karjalainen, Anni Nousiainen, Alma Nurmelin, Viivi Ovaskainen, Mari Tervaniemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Petri PaavilainenCognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, (Haartmaninkatu 3), P.O.B. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland. petri.paavilainen@helsinki.fi.
Leevi KarjalainenDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, (Haartmaninkatu 3), P.O.B. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.
Anni NousiainenDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, (Haartmaninkatu 3), P.O.B. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.
Alma NurmelinDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, (Haartmaninkatu 3), P.O.B. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.
Viivi OvaskainenDepartment of Psychology, University of Helsinki, (Haartmaninkatu 3), P.O.B. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.
Mari TervaniemiCognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, (Haartmaninkatu 3), P.O.B. Box 21, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mismatch-negativity (MMN) component reflects automatic brain mechanisms encoding regularities in the auditory environment and detecting violations in them. Tone series, either descending or ascending in pitch, were used as stimuli. Occasional deviant stimuli (e.g., an ascending tone interspersed among descending tones) violated these regularities. The participants were presented either with a single descending binaural tone stream (identical input to both ears) or simultaneously with two different streams, an ascending stream to the left ear and a descending stream to the right ear. The effects of attention on the MMN were investigated by instructing the participants either to ignore the auditory stimuli or to detect the deviants in the designated ear. In the ignore conditions, the deviants in both the one-stream and two-stream conditions elicited the MMN. However, during the detection task, only the deviants presented in the attended ear elicited the MMN. The results demonstrate that the brain can encode opposite regularities from two simultaneously presented stimulus streams even when the participant’s attention is directed to another modality. However, the brain processes are not completely attention independent, as demonstrated by the lack of MMN to unattended-ear deviants when attention was firmly focused within the auditory modality to the other ear.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionBrainDichotic Listening TestsAcoustic StimulationAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttentionAuditory information processingEvent-related potentials (ERPs)MemoryMismatch negativity (MMN)

Identifiers

PMID41957245
PMCPMC13199388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.