Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957243›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2026

Oral status and dental treatment needs in patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa - a cross-sectional study.

Sebastián Véliz, Pedro Diz-Dios, Colomba Besa-Witto, Susanne Krämer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastián VélizDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Clinic, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1893-3007
Pedro Diz-DiosFacultad de Medicina y Odontoloxia, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-401X
Colomba Besa-WittoSpecial Care Dentistry Unit, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Chile, Olivos 943, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7966-2707
Susanne KrämerDepartment of Dermatology, Medical faculty and medical centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. skramer@odontologia.uchile.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-4022

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the oral health status and dental treatment needs in a cohort of children and adults with different types of Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was designed. 101 participants with EB (EB Simplex n = 26, Junctional EB = 6, Dominant Dystrophic EB (DDEB) = 20, Recessive Dystrophic EB (RDEB) = 47, Kindler EB = 2) were assessed including simplified debris index (DI-S), Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE), Decay/Missing/Filled Teeth index (DMFT/deft index) and Orthodontic index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). Treatment needs were classified into preventive, periodontics, restorative, endodontics, orthodontics, prosthodontics, oral surgery, oral pathology, oral radiology, speech therapy and others. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed.

resultsThe sample showed a Debris Index of 2.04 ± 0.8, with higher levels in participants with recessive dystrophic EB (2.34 ± 0.7). 15.1% of the total sample (n = 15) showed a BPE value of 3 or 4. DMFT was 11.2 ± 0.1, while 30.1% (n = 28/93) showed an ICON value of 43 or higher. Treatment needs were high, with a median of 3 referrals per patient, with the highest needs in restorative dentistry (n=55, 54.5%), prosthodontics (n=52, 51.5%), and speech/oral function therapy (n=43, 42.6%). By EB type, junctional EB (3.67±0.52) and recessive dystrophic EB (3.34±1.03) showed the highest need for referrals.

conclusionOral health status among people living with EB differed across major types. Patients with recessive dystrophic EB were associated with poorer oral hygiene, a higher caries experience and more missing teeth, whereas those with junctional EB were associated with a higher number of restored teeth. On the opposite, those with simplex EB and dominant dystrophic EB were associated with more favourable oral health indicator. The greatest referral needs were for restorative dentistry, prosthodontics and speech therapy, with higher referral needs observed among EB subtypes with high risk of oral disease (recessive dystrophic EB, junctional EB and Kindler EB). Older age was associated with periodontics and prosthodontics referral needs, while male participants were associated with a higher need for speech therapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This research seems to indicate that patients with recessive dystrophic EB and junctional EB are at high risk of oral disease, requiring referrals to at least 3 different dental specialities. In addition to paediatric dentists, special care dentists and orthodontists, dental teams caring for patients with EB should include specialists in restorative dentistry and prosthodontics, with access to consultants in speech and language therapy, endodontics and periodontics.

Indexed as

Epidermolysis BullosaHealth Services Needs and DemandOral HealthAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDental treatment needsEpidermolysis BullosaOral health

Identifiers

PMID41957243
PMCPMC13065552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.