ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-scale covariance filtering for edge-preserving medical image fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-modal medical image integration is necessary to improve the accuracy of diagnostic results by integrating complementary information between modalities such as Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nevertheless, current methods of fusion fail to maintain the finer details of the anatomy, balance of contrast and eliminate artifacts along structural boundaries. In order to solve these issues, this paper will present a new fusion framework that is based on Covariance Filtering. It uses a two-scale image decomposition to extract the base and detail layers and proceeds with saliency-guided weight map creation and covariance-based refinement for spatial consistency and edge preservation. Assessments of multi-modal brain imaging data show that the suggested method is better than the state-of-the-art methods in terms of Entropy, Mutual Information, Average Gradient and QAB/F. All the research findings support its efficacy in maintaining anatomical boundaries, improving visual clarity, and offering a computationally efficient solution. This framework will be expanded to 3D image fusion in future work and dedicated mechanisms used in regions detection to enhance precision in diagnostic processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.