Trial reportScientific reports2026
Non-invasive continuous versus intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure monitoring and maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal hypotension frequently occurs after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. We investigated whether non-invasive continuous finger-cuff arterial pressure monitoring reduces hypotension compared with intermittent oscillometric monitoring. Women undergoing planned cesarean delivery (n = 151) were randomized to the treatment (finger-cuff monitoring with blinded intermittent oscillometric monitoring) or control group (intermittent oscillometric monitoring with blinded finger-cuff monitoring). Both groups received prophylactic phenylephrine. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension, defined as systolic arterial pressure (SAP) < 80% of baseline SAP, from spinal anesthesia to neonatal delivery. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve (AUC), time-weighted average (TWA), and duration of SAP < 80% and < 70% of baseline. Exploratory analyses using various mean arterial pressure thresholds were also performed. Maternal adverse outcomes, phenylephrine consumption, and neonatal outcomes were assessed. The incidence of hypotension did not differ between groups (50.7% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.358). The median AUC for SAP < 80% of baseline was similar (5.0 vs. 5.2 mmHg × min, P = 0.467), as was the median TWA SAP < 80% of baseline (0.19 vs. 0.17 mmHg, P = 0.617). Secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Continuous finger-cuff monitoring did not significantly reduce maternal hypotension; however, the observed effect trend suggests that larger-scale trials are required to definitively determine its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.