Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957218›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Non-invasive continuous versus intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure monitoring and maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Youngwon Kim, Hansol Kim, Seokha Yoo, Jin-Tae Kim, Da Young Gim, Sun-Kyung Park

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Youngwon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hansol KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seokha YooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Tae KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Da Young GimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Kyung ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. mayskpark@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal hypotension frequently occurs after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. We investigated whether non-invasive continuous finger-cuff arterial pressure monitoring reduces hypotension compared with intermittent oscillometric monitoring. Women undergoing planned cesarean delivery (n = 151) were randomized to the treatment (finger-cuff monitoring with blinded intermittent oscillometric monitoring) or control group (intermittent oscillometric monitoring with blinded finger-cuff monitoring). Both groups received prophylactic phenylephrine. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension, defined as systolic arterial pressure (SAP) < 80% of baseline SAP, from spinal anesthesia to neonatal delivery. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve (AUC), time-weighted average (TWA), and duration of SAP < 80% and < 70% of baseline. Exploratory analyses using various mean arterial pressure thresholds were also performed. Maternal adverse outcomes, phenylephrine consumption, and neonatal outcomes were assessed. The incidence of hypotension did not differ between groups (50.7% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.358). The median AUC for SAP < 80% of baseline was similar (5.0 vs. 5.2 mmHg × min, P = 0.467), as was the median TWA SAP < 80% of baseline (0.19 vs. 0.17 mmHg, P = 0.617). Secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Continuous finger-cuff monitoring did not significantly reduce maternal hypotension; however, the observed effect trend suggests that larger-scale trials are required to definitively determine its clinical utility.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureCesarean SectionHypotensionOscillometryAdultAnesthesia, SpinalBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleHumansPhenylephrinePregnancyPhenylephrineArterial pressureCesarean deliveryMaternal hypotensionPost-spinal hypotensionSpinal anesthesia-mediated hypotension

Identifiers

PMID41957218
PMCPMC13199375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.