ArticleScientific reports2026
Managing the aftermath: complications and outcome after colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis-insights from a certified surgical endoscopy center.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) often affects the bowel and may necessitate colorectal resection. While protective ileostomy can reduce complications, it carries relevant morbidity. This study evaluates endoscopic complication management and long-term outcome of patients treated at a certified surgical endoscopy and endometriosis center. All patients undergoing interdisciplinary surgery for DIE (2015-2024) were retrospectively included. Preoperative sigmoidoscopy and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of anastomoses were performed routinely. Surgical approaches included shaving, excision or resection with/without ileostomy. Surgical complications, such as anastomotic leakages and stenoses, were primarily managed endoscopically. 118 women (median age: 33 years) underwent surgery: rectal shaving (25%), sigmoid (6%) and rectal resection (69%). Median anastomotic height was 10 cm, 44% received a protective ileostomy. Anastomotic leakage (8%) and stenosis (9%) were successfully managed endoscopically. Recurrence requiring reoperation occurred in 41% after shaving vs. 27% after resection. Ileostomy reversal was achieved in all cases. Postoperative continence was acceptable (LARS median: 13). General health (EQ-5D-5 L: median 70) was good at a median follow-up of 75 months. 84% would choose surgical treatment again. Colorectal resection for DIE can achieve favorable long-term outcomes in a structured interdisciplinary setting. Proactive endoscopic management supports bowel continuity despite complications. Prospective studies are needed to validate outcomes and refine patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.