Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957177›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Targeted and molecular therapies in Ewing sarcoma: a comprehensive review of preclinical and clinical advances.

Christèle Asmar, Raphael Asmar, Guy Awad, Marc Boutros, Reina Khatib, Shaza Hammad, Caren Hassan, Nicole Mallory, Karim Masrouha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christèle AsmarUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon. christele.asmar@net.usj.edu.lb.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8831-2986
Raphael AsmarUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Guy AwadUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Marc BoutrosUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Reina KhatibUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Shaza HammadUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Caren HassanUniversité Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Nicole MalloryNYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Karim MasrouhaNYU Langone Health, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEwing sarcoma (EWS) is an aggressive small round blue cell malignancy driven by EWSR1::ETS fusions, with poor survival outcomes in metastatic and relapsed disease. While multimodal chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of therapy, emerging agents hold potential to overcome resistance and improve outcomes.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar through February 2026 identified 1,166 records. Following duplicate removal and two-stage screening, 87 preclinical and clinical studies were included. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively, with emphasis on therapeutic class, mechanism of action, side effects, and translational relevance.

resultsAcross therapeutic classes, several promising avenues emerged. Direct EWS-FLI1 targeting (TK216, trabectedin combinations, CRISPR-based approaches) demonstrated preliminary clinical and robust preclinical efficacy. IGF-1R inhibitors (linsitinib, ganitumab, and figitumumab) showed biological activity, though limited survival benefit in trials. CD99-directed therapies, including monoclonal antibodies and siRNA-nanoparticle conjugates, achieved synergy with chemotherapy in xenografts. PARP inhibitors exhibited preclinical efficacy, particularly in combination regimens, though monotherapy responses were modest in clinical cohorts. Kinase inhibitors targeting WEE1, DNA-PK, and Aurora A kinase, as well as multikinase TKIs (cabozantinib, regorafenib, and anlotinib), revealed varying degrees of cytotoxicity and disease stabilization. Epigenetic therapies, including LSD1, HDAC, and EZH2 inhibitors, attenuated EWS-FLI1 transcriptional programs and enhanced chemosensitivity. Immunotherapeutic approaches (immune checkpoint inhibitors, IGF-1R antibodies, Vigil vaccine) have so far yielded limited responses, though selected strategies showed potential benefit in subsets. Novel agents such as verteporfin, evofosfamide, and proteasome inhibitors further expanded the spectrum of vulnerabilities.

conclusionsTargeted and molecular therapies in EWS show significant promise, particularly in rational combinations that exploit the tumor's dependence on EWS-FLI1-driven transcriptional dysregulation, DNA damage repair deficiencies, or survival signaling. Future research must prioritize biomarker-driven patient selection, integration of multiomics approaches, and multicenter prospective trials to translate these strategies into clinically meaningful improvements in EWS survival.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapySarcoma, EwingAnimalsHumansProto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1RNA-Binding Protein EWSAntineoplastic AgentsProto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1RNA-Binding Protein EWSClinical outcomesEwing sarcomaEWSR–ETSEWSR–FLI1Mechanisms of actionPrecision oncologySide effectsTargeted therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.