ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Availability, utilization, and barriers to bowel ultrasound for necrotizing enterocolitis: a national multidisciplinary survey.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize availability, utilization, and barriers to bowel ultrasound (BUS) for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
methodsA survey of neonatologists, surgeons, and radiologists at Children's Hospitals' Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) sites. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; open-ended responses underwent thematic analysis.
resultsIn total, 104 respondents from 42/46 institutions participated. BUS was available at 83% of level IV NICU sites, with 64% reporting 24/7 availability. However, only 42% of affiliated level III NICUs had BUS available. BUS was primarily used alongside radiographs in cases of diagnostic uncertainty and variably used to guide surgical decisions. Radiologists frequently used protocols while neonatologists and surgeons reported limited training and few institutional guidelines. Key barriers included lack of standardization, inadequate training, and unclear clinical utility.
conclusionBUS is increasingly available in level IV NICUs but less so in level III NICUs. Even when available, clinical integration is inconsistent due to gaps in standardization, training, and supporting evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41957166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.