ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatial heterogeneity and drivers of social vulnerability in chinese floodplains: a PCA-MGWR approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatial heterogeneity of social vulnerability in China’s floodplains remains underexplored, particularly regarding how rapid urbanization and unique demographic shifts-specifically the “floating population” and an aging society-reshape human-water relationships. This study quantifies flood exposure across 361 Chinese cities by integrating the 2020 Seventh National Population Census with high-resolution (250 m) floodplain maps via a pixel-based spatial aggregation approach. This methodology captures both absolute population scales and relative structural dependencies within hazard zones, effectively eliminating estimation bias from administrative-level averages. We propose a coupled Principal Component Analysis and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (PCA-MGWR) framework to mitigate multicollinearity among socioeconomic variables while capturing spatially varying scale effects. The analysis identifies four distinct vulnerability dimensions: floating population (PC-FP), livelihood instability (PC-LI), low education (PC-EL), and lack of action capabilities (PC-AC). The PCA-MGWR model (R2 = 0.713) significantly outperforms traditional OLS and GWR models in explanatory power. Crucially, results reveal a “Paradox of Wealth Exposure” along the developed Yangtze River Economic Belt, where affluent regions exhibit higher flood exposure, challenging the conventional poverty-driven vulnerability narrative. Furthermore, the driving mechanisms exhibit significant spatial non-stationarity: (1) In eastern megacities, the floating population shows a statistical “risk aversion” effect driven by housing market sorting, yet remains vulnerable due to “institutional segregation” in emergency management; (2) In old industrial bases and eastern plains, an “in-situ aging” phenomenon has created a “spatial lock-in,” trapping elderly populations in high-risk zones. These findings suggest that “mobility” and “aging” have emerged as critical drivers of vulnerability in China alongside economic factors. Consequently, we advocate for spatially differentiated governance strategies, shifting from “one-size-fits-all” defenses to adaptive policies that address specific regional socio-hydrological traps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.