ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine-enhanced reconstruction of functional connectomes unravels discriminative brain sub-systems in health and disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstructing functional brain networks from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data typically relies on statistical pruning, where pairwise correlations between brain Regions of Interest (ROIs) are independently thresholded, ignoring potentially relevant collective co-activation patterns within sub-networks. Here we introduce a functional pruning approach that identifies which connections to retain based on their collective importance for distinguishing healthy from affected individuals, rather than on their individual statistical significance. We use geometric deep learning to learn network representations and an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) tool to identify the most discriminative sub-networks. Using fMRI data from healthy and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) subjects, we build multilayer network representations from a multi-frequency decomposition of the signals and provide robust evidence that the machine-learned sub-systemic co-activation patterns significantly improve the identification of affected individuals. Our results demonstrate how functional pruning - which is based on collective, rather than individual, co-activation patterns - provides mechanistic insights that can be reliably used to characterize brain disorders, at variance with statistical pruning. Our approach is general and can be applied to find biomarkers for other brain diseases and, more broadly, to analyze complex systems where only the activity of individual units can be measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.