ArticleScientific reports2026
Regime-aware hybrid ensemble learning for adaptive [Formula: see text] forecasting in urban environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of fine particulate matter PM2.5 is critical for mitigating adverse health and environmental impacts, yet existing models often fail to adapt to dynamic meteorological regimes. This study introduces a novel hybrid ensemble framework that adaptively switches between CatBoost and TabNet based on meteorological dispersion parameters, enabling context-specific model dominance. The approach was evaluated using the OpenAQ dataset, comprising hourly PM2.5 concentrations and corresponding meteorological variables across Delhi, India. The adaptive switching mechanism, driven by ventilation coefficient and relative humidity thresholds, resulted in CatBoost dominance for 58% of days, TabNet dominance for 35%, and balanced contributions for the remainder. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed ensemble achieved an RMSE of 15.54, MAE of 11.02, MAPE of 12.2%, and [Formula: see text] of 0.86, outperforming established baselines such as LSTM, XGBoost, and LightGBM, with statistically significant improvements ([Formula: see text]). Efficiency analysis revealed only a 14% increase in inference time compared to CatBoost alone, while offering substantial gains in predictive accuracy. Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis further identified an optimal configuration (learning rate = 0.01, batch size = 64) balancing convergence stability and generalization. By integrating model interpretability, adaptive learning, and computational efficiency, this research presents a scalable forecasting solution for urban air quality management. The methodology's design allows seamless extension to other pollutants, geographic regions, and ensemble combinations, positioning it as a practical tool for data-driven environmental policy and public health protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.