ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Salvage post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection: evolving paradigm for marker-positive non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors management.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in non-seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) patients with persistently elevated serum tumour markers remains controversial, although traditional management favours salvage chemotherapy. This study aimed to re-define the surgical and oncologic outcomes of salvage PC-RPLND.
methodsWe select 107 (2008-2023) consecutive NSGCT patients undergoing PC-RPLND with elevated markers after ≥1 chemotherapy line. Multivariable linear regression models (MLRM), and Cox proportional hazards models recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were used.
resultsDefinitive histology revealed viable GCT (47.7%), post-pubertal teratoma (32.7%), fibro-necrotic tissue (FNT) (11.4%), and somatic malignancy (8.4%). After a median follow-up of 45 months, overall 5-year RFS was 54% and OS was 68%. Outcomes varied significantly by histology: post-pubertal teratoma had superior 5-year OS (96%) and RFS (77%), while somatic malignancy and FNT predicted worse RFS (MCRM HRs 23.11 and 28.77, respectively). Larger residual mass size correlated with higher relapse risk and increased probability of somatic malignancy. Advanced stage and increasing chemotherapy lines also associated with poorer outcomes.
conclusionsSalvage PC-RPLND for marker-positive NSGCT achieved meaningful survival, particularly for patients with post-pubertal teratoma. These findings support surgery, even as first-line salvage, when teratoma or somatic malignancy is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.