ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental and computational insights into the CuFeMoO₄ modified CMC microbeads for effective removal of methylene blue from aqueous media.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CuFeMoO₄/CMC microbeads were synthesized by crosslinking CuFeMoO₄ with carboxymethyl cellulose using AlCl₃ as a crosslinker. The microbeads were used as a catalyst in the reduction of methylene blue (MB) by sodium borohydride (NaBH4). The catalyst was characterized with FT-IR, XRD, BET, SEM, EDX, and TEM techniques. It has a surface area of 34.88 m2g− 1 and a pore diameter of 1.9212 nm. Within 45 min, the catalytic efficiency of the CuFeMoO4 composite increased from 25.8% to 99.2% after modification with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). The reduction rate constant followed the order CuFeMoO4/CMC (0.9609 ± 0.0233 min− 1) > CMC (0.2274 ± 0.00592 min− 1) > CuFeMoO4 (0.1365 ± 0.00445 min− 1). The catalytic reaction was carried under several reaction conditions, including catalyst dose, dye and NaBH4 concentrations, pH, NaCl concentration, temperature, and a radical scavenger. The results fit well with the pseudo-first-order kinetics. No significant change in the catalytic efficiency of the CuFeMoO₄/CMC up to the fifth cycle of reusability, demonstrating its high stability during the reaction. The basis function 6–31 G++ (d, p) in conjunction with the DFT method was applied for the computational investigation. Molecular modeling was carried out in both the gas phase and in water solvent to precisely predict the molecular structure, physicochemical properties, and spectroscopic spectra of MB, thereby validating the experimental results. Computational FT-IR, time-dependent-DFT (TD-DFT), natural bond orbital (NBO), and molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) were all calculated. The computational data and the experimental findings were in good agreement. Based on the regeneration data, CuFeMoO4/CMC proved a promising catalyst in the removal of MB from water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.