ArticleScientific reports2026
Fusing non-textual cues with classical NLP for enhanced multimodal fake news spread detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing spread of misinformation on social platforms has made it necessary to develop automated and accurate fake news detection systems. Traditional methods that focus solely on textual content are ineffective in dealing with more complex fake news that mimic authentic writing styles. This research introduces a novel multi-modal deep learning architecture for fake news detection that achieves a more comprehensive understanding of the content by intelligently integrating non-textual clues (including statistical and behavioral features) and deep textual features. In the proposed model, news features are extracted from distinct modalities: statistically engineered features and behavioral-communicational characteristics of news publishers, character-level features (to deal with misspellings and words outside the vocabulary), as well as word-level semantic features using the Word-level features (Word2Vec) model. Each of these information modalities is processed by a dedicated deep network to produce compact and rich representations of each one. Then, in an innovative step, these representations are intelligently merged using a Multi-Head Self-Attention (MHSA) mechanism to dynamically determine the weight and importance of each modality. Finally, the fused feature vector is used by a SoftMax classifier to finally detect whether the news is fake or authentic. The evaluation results of the proposed method, which were performed on two valid GossipCop and PolitiFact datasets, demonstrated remarkable efficiency. On the GossipCop dataset, accuracy values of 0.99 and F-measure of 0.98 were achieved by the proposed method, demonstrating the high ability of the model in identifying news accurately and completely. Similarly, on the PolitiFact dataset, values of accuracy of 0.96 and F-measure of 0.95 were acquired. This high performance on both datasets indicates an evident dominance over the comparative approaches and confirms the validity and performance of the proposed multi-modal technique for detecting fake news.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.