ArticleScientific reports2026
ChatHTN: a consultation model for hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has greatly advanced natural language processing (NLP). While these models perform remarkably well in tasks such as text generation and translation, they still face challenges in highly specialized domains such as hypertension, where domain expertise and personalization are crucial. To address these limitations, we introduce a generative framework for intelligent hypertension consultation that combines a domain-specific knowledge graph, a multi-task fine-tuning strategy, and a specialized dataset. The knowledge graph enhances the model’s medical knowledge, while the multi-task fine-tuning mechanism optimizes tasks like medical entity recognition and etiology classification to ensure consistency. To further strengthen reasoning ability, we construct HTN-5M, a large-scale Chinese dataset that embeds chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in a structured triplet format (input, output, CoT), supporting both question-answer generation and auxiliary learning. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms strong baselines, achieving a 16.25% improvement over DeepSeek-LLM-67B-base on the CMB benchmark and an approximate 10% gain over HuatuoGPT across three medical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.