ArticleScientific reports2026
Dissecting genetic variant contributions to neurodegenerative disorders through targeted gene sequencing in a Sicilian population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Amyloid Hypothesis: Systemic Drivers, CNS-PNS Crosstalk, and the Future of Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Analytical Methods for Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease from Discovery to Clinical Implementation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the technological advancements in modern genetic diagnosis, customized genetic panels are still frequently employed for diagnostic purposes due to their rapid, efficient, and cost-effective ability to detect genetic variants. In this study, we utilized a customized genetic panel designed to identify genetic variants associated with neurodegenerative disorders. The panel consisted of 61 genes and was applied to a cohort of 186 unrelated individuals diagnosed with different degenerative cognitive and movement disorders. The identified variants were filtered for a minor allele frequency of less than 1% and classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines. Our results showed that 20.97% of individuals carried at least one likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant, with 35% of those individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The positive diagnostic yield of the panel was 16.67%, calculated based on variant zygosity, inheritance pattern, and concordance with the clinical phenotype. Furthermore, 34.41% of the individuals carried variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and 44.62% carried benign variants. Variants have been found only in 58 genes. Among these, 24.14% showed benign variants, 48.28% had VUS, and 27.59% carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Principal component analysis analysis based on the variables "age at onset" in addition to the phenotypic scores "MMSE" (global cognitive screening test), "IADL" (instrumental activities of daily living), and "ADL" (basic activities of daily living) distributed the individuals associated with the specific disease and variant in the plot. Notably, the individuals showed AD exhibited an average age at onset of 68 ± 12.5 years and were differentiated in the plot. GBA gene exhibited the highest number of pathogenic variants (9) linked to AD, Parkinson's disease, early onset parkinsonism with epilepsy, fronto-temporal dementia, and mild cognitive impairment. The results highlighted a broad phenotypic heterogeneity associated with genes previously linked to only a limited number of neurodegenerative conditions, underscoring the value of the genetic testing performed. Translationally, although clinical exome sequencing has enabled novel gene discovery in neurodegenerative disorders, targeted genetic panels remain a cost-effective and clinically valuable approach for routine diagnostics. In this context, our study highlights the "real-world" utility and clinical impact of a focused panel-based strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.