ArticleScientific reports2026
Non-invasive endometriosis staging prediction using integrated radiomics and spatiotemporal transformer model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Ovarian Endometriosis Imaging: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Emerging Evidence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise staging of endometriosis remains a clinical challenge, as current diagnosis depends almost entirely on laparoscopic visualization-an invasive procedure marked by considerable inter-observer disagreement and diagnostic delays. Existing non-invasive approaches, whether based on conventional machine learning with handcrafted features or end-to-end deep learning architectures, have shown limited success in capturing the complex spatiotemporal characteristics of endometriotic lesions on dynamic imaging. Traditional radiomics methods struggle to model temporal enhancement patterns, while pure deep learning approaches often overlook domain-specific textural signatures that correlate with disease severity. To address these limitations, we developed a computational framework that combines the interpretability of engineered radiomics features with the representational power of spatiotemporal Transformers, specifically designed for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Our dual-pathway architecture employs cross-modal attention mechanisms that allow bidirectional refinement between texture-based descriptors and learned spatiotemporal representations, alongside adaptive weighting that adjusts feature contributions based on individual case characteristics. When evaluated on a multi-institutional cohort of 486 surgically confirmed cases, the model achieved 87.8% accuracy with a macro-averaged F1-score of 0.854 on the test set, substantially outperforming both traditional machine learning baselines and single-modality deep networks. Independent validation on 127 retrospective patients from an external center demonstrated consistent performance with 85.0% accuracy, suggesting reasonable generalization across different clinical settings. Attention weight visualizations revealed that the model appropriately focuses on anatomical structures documented in surgical staging criteria, including ovarian endometriomas, deep infiltrating sites, and peritoneal implants. By providing interpretable staging predictions with quantified confidence levels, this framework may support preoperative risk stratification and assist clinicians in identifying patients who would benefit most from surgical intervention, though its ultimate impact on treatment decision-making requires further retrospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.