ArticleScientific data2026
Medical Spine Sagittal MRI Dataset for Segmentation and Foraminal Stenosis detection.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Spine Neuroimaging: Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers in Lower Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Medical Spine Sagittal MRI Dataset for Segmentation and Foraminal Stenosis detection.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lumbar spine disorders represent one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions worldwide, particularly among the elderly population. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard diagnostic tool due to its superior ability to visualize soft tissues, neural structures, and degenerative changes. However, accurate interpretation of lumbar MRI scans requires specialized clinical expertise and remains time-consuming and costly. As the demand for automated diagnostic support increases, the development of robust artificial intelligence (AI) systems critically relies on large, high-quality, and precisely annotated datasets. To address this need, we introduce a new sagittal lumbar spine MRI dataset comprising 500 patients, enriched with comprehensive anatomical annotations. The dataset includes foraminal detection labels extracted by expert neurosurgeons, provided as bounding-box annotations with clinically assigned severity grades for each lumbar level on both left and right sides. In addition, it contains pixel-level segmentation masks for the vertebrae, intervertebral discs, sacrum, and posterior elements (Posterior A and Posterior B), which were generated by an AI-based model and subsequently validated and refined by expert neurosurgeons to ensure anatomical accuracy. Both the detection and segmentation annotations are further evaluated using AI models to confirm their reliability for downstream clinical and research applications. To demonstrate the dataset's utility, we developed a complete AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for foraminal stenosis analysis, consisting of automated slice selection, region-of-interest localization, and severity classification. The system achieved 86% accuracy in slice selection, 90% accuracy in region of interest (ROI) localization, and 65% accuracy in severity classification, reflecting the complexity of the task and the diagnostic value of the dataset. For anatomical segmentation, the best-performing architecture, SegResNet, achieved a DSC of 97.32%, HD95 of 2.337 (mm), and a recall of 97.30%, confirming the consistency and robustness of the segmentation annotations. Overall, the proposed dataset provides a reliable, richly annotated foundation for developing and benchmarking advanced AI algorithms in lumbar spine analysis, supporting a wide range of clinical and research applications from anatomical segmentation and morphological analysis to automated foraminal stenosis assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.