ArticleScientific reports2026
Stages of objective memory impairment are associated with accelerated brain aging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable staging of early memory decline is essential for identifying individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. The Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) framework provides a clinically scalable tool for characterizing episodic memory loss, yet its neurobiological validity remains underexplored. Recent advances in plasma biomarkers (e.g., p-tau217, p-tau181, Aβ42/40) offer emerging blood-based alternatives to CSF and PET, although their diagnostic implementation continues to evolve. Here, we examine whether SOMI stages reflect widespread brain aging, as indexed by BrainAGE, a structural MRI–based biomarker quantifying deviation from normative aging trajectories. While previous studies have linked SOMI to hippocampal atrophy and tau pathology, no study to date has examined its association with a global MRI-derived biomarker of systemic brain aging. In a well-characterized cohort of 119 older adults on the Alzheimer’s disease continuum, we evaluated whether higher SOMI stages were linked to elevated BrainAGE scores and examined whether this association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, education, and hippocampal volume. Higher SOMI stages were robustly associated with elevated BrainAGE scores, indicating accelerated neurobiological aging. This relationship remained significant after adjusting for covariates and was confirmed in sensitivity analyses. Notably, a marked discontinuity in BrainAGE emerged between SOMI stages 0–2 and 3–5, aligning with the theoretical transition from retrieval to storage impairment, long recognized as a turning point in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. These findings validate SOMI as a low-cost, non-invasive behavioral marker of systemic brain health. By linking cognitive staging to global neuroimaging biomarkers, our study supports SOMI’s translational utility for large-scale screening, clinical trial stratification, and early intervention planning in Alzheimer’s disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.