Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957037›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

The Smart Inertial Device Data from Human Activities dataset.

Riccardo Pignari, Bendetto Leto, Stefano Quer, Enrico Macii, Gianvito Urgese, Vittorio Fra

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Riccardo PignariPolitecnico di Torino, Turin, 10129, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-8613
Bendetto LetoPolitecnico di Torino, Turin, 10129, Italy.
Stefano QuerPolitecnico di Torino, Turin, 10129, Italy.
Enrico MaciiPolitecnico di Torino, Turin, 10129, Italy.
Gianvito UrgesePolitecnico di Torino, Turin, 10129, Italy. gianvito.urgese@polito.it.
Vittorio FraPolitecnico di Torino, Turin, 10129, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of smart devices with inertial measurement units has driven human activity recognition (HAR) research for several years. However, existing datasets like the Smartphone and Smartwatch Activity and Biometrics Dataset (from the Wireless Sensor Data Mining Lab, i.e., the WISDM Lab) may suffer from non-uniform sampling, missing data, and sensor misalignment. To overcome the limitations mentioned above, we present the Smart Inertial Device Data from Human Activities (SIDDHA) dataset, which is a meticulous reconstruction of the previously described dataset. Our rigorous reconstruction employs a two-phase characterization followed by spline interpolation methods for resampling and filtering, yielding a uniformly sampled and realigned data. An additional key innovation of this process is to include spike-encoded inertial data, generated using eleven distinct encoding techniques. We specifically tailor this process for spiking neural networks and neuromorphic computing. Technical validation confirms SIDDHA's enhanced quality. Experimental results demonstrate an improved HAR and better accuracy on SIDDHA's raw data with recurrent architectures such as the Legendre memory unit, and the long short-term memory.

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID41957037
PMCPMC13250143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.