Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957035›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Improved tumor-only variant calling and mutation burden estimation with VarNet-T.

Kiran Krishnamachari, Huu An Bui Nguyen, Sinem Kadioglu, Jet Ong Tze, Anders Jacobsen Skanderup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiran KrishnamachariGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-6811
Huu An Bui NguyenGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Sinem KadiogluGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Jet Ong TzeGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Anders Jacobsen SkanderupGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Republic of Singapore. skanderupamj@a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6847-4980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic variant calling algorithms typically detect mutations in cancer genomes by comparing sequence data from a tumor sample against a matched normal sample. However, matched normal samples are often unavailable in clinical diagnostics or retrospective analyses of archival tumor samples in biobanks, compromising variant calling accuracy due to the difficulty in distinguishing somatic mutations from germline mutations or sequencing artifacts. Here, we introduce VarNet-T, an end-to-end weakly supervised deep learning framework for accurately identifying somatic variants from aligned tumor reads without a matched normal sample. VarNet-T is trained using millions of high-confidence variants and benchmarked using public datasets, demonstrating 20-33% performance improvement over existing methods. We assess the accuracy of tumor mutation burden (TMB) estimation on 1000 tumor samples spanning 10 solid cancer types. Compared to existing methods, VarNet-T demonstrates >3x higher accuracy in TMB-high status classification, suggesting significant potential to improve patient selection for immunotherapy. Overall, the improved accuracy of VarNet-T has the potential to enhance the utility of tumor-only sequencing in cancer research and clinical molecular diagnostics.

Indexed as

MutationNeoplasmsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID41957035
PMCPMC13243554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.