ArticleNature communications2026
Improved tumor-only variant calling and mutation burden estimation with VarNet-T.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Somatic likelihood tiering: an interpretable post-calling triage protocol for tumor-only whole-exome variant review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somatic variant calling algorithms typically detect mutations in cancer genomes by comparing sequence data from a tumor sample against a matched normal sample. However, matched normal samples are often unavailable in clinical diagnostics or retrospective analyses of archival tumor samples in biobanks, compromising variant calling accuracy due to the difficulty in distinguishing somatic mutations from germline mutations or sequencing artifacts. Here, we introduce VarNet-T, an end-to-end weakly supervised deep learning framework for accurately identifying somatic variants from aligned tumor reads without a matched normal sample. VarNet-T is trained using millions of high-confidence variants and benchmarked using public datasets, demonstrating 20-33% performance improvement over existing methods. We assess the accuracy of tumor mutation burden (TMB) estimation on 1000 tumor samples spanning 10 solid cancer types. Compared to existing methods, VarNet-T demonstrates >3x higher accuracy in TMB-high status classification, suggesting significant potential to improve patient selection for immunotherapy. Overall, the improved accuracy of VarNet-T has the potential to enhance the utility of tumor-only sequencing in cancer research and clinical molecular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.