ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Identifying neurophenotypes of major depressive disorder through normative model of regional homogeneity.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly heterogeneous mental illness, marked by clinical variability and distinct neuropathological mechanisms. This study sought to enhance diagnostic precision for MDD by identifying neurophenotypes using a normative model of regional homogeneity (ReHo), offering new avenues for precision medicine. Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 1101 patients with MDD and 1011 healthy controls (HCs) sourced from the REST-meta-MDD project, we developed the first normative model of ReHo. Gaussian process regression was applied to predict a normative lifespan trajectory based on age and sex in HCs, enabling quantification of individual deviations from the model for patients with MDD. Unsupervised clustering algorithms were then employed to classify MDD subtypes, followed by validation analyses to assess clustering stability. Significant deviations from the normative ReHo model were observed in patients with MDD. Two distinct MDD subtypes emerged: Emotional dysregulation subtype, characterized by negative deviations in the frontoparietal control network, ventral attention network, default mode network, and limbic network (Cohen's d = 0.40-1.75, FDR-corrected p < 0.05). This subtype correlated with more severe overall depressive symptom (d = 0.17, p = 0.010), better insight (d = -0.25, p = 0.009), younger age (d = -0.19, p = 0.003), lower medication usage (Cramer's V = 0.09, p = 0.017), a negative correlation between symptom severity and illness duration (r = -0.21, p < 0.001), severe brain dysfunction (Partial η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.