ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
A Latent Variable Approach for Causal Effect Estimation Under Misclassified Treatment Assignment.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Misclassification in treatment assignment is a common issue in causal inference with observational studies, often leading to biased estimates of causal effects if unaddressed. Several methods have been developed to handle this issue by making use of a validation dataset. This paper proposes a robust latent variable approach for causal effect estimation without the need of validation data. By employing a potential outcome modeling framework that incorporates true treatment assignment as a latent variable, we construct a likelihood function that involves three models: the outcome model, the measurement error model for misclassification, and the propensity score model for treatment assignment. To enhance the robustness against misspecification of the measurement error mechanism, we further incorporate neural networks into the estimation of the measurement error model. The simulation results show that our method performed well under various misclassification assumptions, and that using neural networks reduced the impact of misspecification of functional form for the measurement error model. We illustrate the method using a synthetic dataset derived from the Right Heart Catheterization (RHC) study. This flexible framework mitigates bias and improves the reliability of causal inference when treatment assignment is subject to misclassification and no validation data is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.