ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
HosTIL territory: mapping the landscape of toxicity in TIL therapy.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy for oral cavity tumors: recent advances, key challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy: Historical context, clinical applications, and future directions.Cancer · 2026Review
- Article
- CRISPR-screen informed engineered T cell therapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada for the management of patients with advanced melanoma refractory to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, with regulatory assessments underway in other jurisdictions. TIL therapy typically involves a multistep process including surgical tumor resection, non-myeloablative lymphodepletion, infusion of autologous polyclonal T cells, and administration of high-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL-2). Toxicities are predominantly associated with the induction chemotherapy regimen and post-TIL infusion HD-IL-2, rather than the TIL product itself. Over half of treated patients experience cytopenias, pyrexia, rigors, and gastrointestinal symptoms, with additional toxicities including acute kidney injury, rash, peripheral neuropathy, diarrhea, alopecia, and hypotension. Severe but less frequent adverse events include neutropenic sepsis, cytokine release syndrome, capillary leak syndrome, neurotoxicity, autoimmune sequelae, and cardiac dysfunction. These toxicities typically occur in a predictable temporal window and resolve within 10-12 days post-TIL infusion. Despite this, management often requires rigorous supportive care, and thus, toxicity remains a barrier to broader patient eligibility and wider implementation. Currently, no validated biomarkers exist to predict toxicity risk, underscoring the need for further research. This is particularly critical in the context of emerging combinatorial approaches integrating TIL therapy with other immunomodulatory agents, which may compound toxicity and complicate clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.