Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41956487›Full record

ReviewHospital pediatrics2026

An Introduction to Machine Learning for the Pediatric Hospitalist.

Austin G Meyer, Stephanie Blasick, Shihao Yang, Mauricio Santillana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hospital pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin G MeyerDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas.
Stephanie BlasickDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas.
Shihao YangH. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mauricio SantillanaMIGHTE Laboratory, Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS L70 AI194328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning models are increasingly used in clinical research to predict patient outcomes, yet many clinicians lack the training to critically appraise these studies. This article provides a conceptual introduction to machine learning for the pediatric hospitalist with no prior computational experience. We focus on the most common application in clinical medicine: supervised learning, where models learn from data with known outcomes to make predictions about new unseen patients. Core tasks such as classification and regression are explained, along with intuitive models like decision trees and advanced methods like ensembles. Essential concepts for critical appraisal, including overfitting and leakage, the challenge of interpretability, and data bias, are highlighted. We emphasize the importance of model validation and the distinction among prediction, interpretation, and causation. The article concludes by deconstructing a published pediatric study to illustrate these principles in practice, equipping the reader to better understand and evaluate research that uses machine learning. Our goal is to equip pediatric hospitalists with the foundational knowledge to become informed consumers and potential contributors within the machine learning ecosystem, ensuring that this technology augments, rather than replaces, clinical judgment.

Indexed as

HospitalistsMachine LearningPediatricsClassification AlgorithmsHospitals, PediatricHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Models

Identifiers

PMID41956487
PMCPMC13367448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.