ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Patient-associated and treatment-related predictive factors influencing the duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Impaction to Eruption, Simplified Management of Two Teeth Impacted by a Large Mandibular Cyst: A Clinical Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine various patient- and treatment-related factors contributing to prolonged therapy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of consecutively treated patients from a private orthodontic clinic. Univariate and multivariable linear regression were conducted to investigate patient- and treatment-related factors associated with increased orthodontic treatment duration. Results: A total of 357 patients, with a median age of 14 years (IQR = 13, 17), females (n = 220, 61.6%), was included. Orthodontic treatment lasted a mean of 28.5 ± 10 months. Multivariable linear regression revealed that significant patient-related factors for increased duration were Angle Class II-Class I (B = 4.78; 95% CI = 2.74, 6.81; P < .001) and impacted (B = 9.68; 95% CI = 5.41, 13.94; P < .001), while treatment-related factors were dental arch (B = -9.89; 95%CI = -13.14, -6.64; P < .001), molar attachment (B = 3.05; 95% CI = 0.35, 5.76; P = .027), and extraction (B = 3.73; 95% CI = 1.52, 5.94; P = .001). Investigation in Class II cases indicated that Class II subdivision exhibited significantly shorter duration than bilateral Class II (P = .033). Conclusions: Class II compared with Class I and the presence of at least one impacted tooth were significant patient-related factors, while dual-arch orthodontic treatment, preferring bands over tubes, and including at least one extraction in the treatment plan were significant treatment-related factors for prolonged therapy. Class II (nonsubdivision) was associated with extended duration in contrast with Class II subdivision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41956480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.