ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Interaction between reflected shock waves and laser-induced cavitation bubbles.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study experimentally investigates the interaction between acoustically reflected shock-wave echoes and laser-induced cavitation bubbles confined within cylindrical tubes. In these macroscopic experiments, the tube radius was systematically varied to control the timing and amplitude of reflected shocks relative to the bubble lifetime. Time-resolved high-speed imaging captured the bubble's expansion and collapse dynamics, revealing that early reflected echoes, returning within microseconds after the initial breakdown, strongly influence the collapse symmetry and morphology. Depending on their timing and intensity, these echoes compress the bubble along the tube axis, leading to prolate deformations and extended collapse durations. To complement these findings at the nanoscale, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to examine the interaction between plasma-induced shock waves and nanobubbles within cylindrical confinement. The simulations show that higher-energy pulses generate strong rebound shocks that induce prolate deformation and secondary growth-collapse cycles. Together, the experimental and atomistic results reveal a consistent physical mechanism across scales, where confinement-induced shock reflections modulated bubble dynamics through the timing and amplitude of early reflected waves. These findings provide new insight into echo-driven cavitation in confined geometries, with potential implications for ultrasonic cleaning, biomedical cavitation, and focused acoustic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.