ReviewInternational dental journal2026
Data Availability Statements of Publications in Journals Indexed in the Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine Category of Journal Citation Reports: A Meta-Research Study.
Review in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the frequency and types of data availability statements (DASs) of publications in journals indexed in the Dentistry, Oral surgery and Medical (DOM) category of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) database, and to identify risk indicators associated with the presence of DASs in publications. We searched PubMed on October 18, 2024, for publications presenting original research involving human subjects, published in journals indexed in the DOM category of JCR database, after July 1, 2023. Each included publication was assessed for DAS, which was categorised into different types using Springer Nature's standard DAS framework. The risk indicators regarding author, study and journal levels were extracted. Logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the association between the risk indicators and the presence of DASs. A total of 998 publications were included. Fewer than half (49.7%) of the included publications contained a DAS. The 2 most common DAS types were datasets being available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request with a prevalence of 40.4% (N = 403) and authors directly providing the repository and/or weblink for the datasets with a prevalence of 3.0% (N = 30). The presence of DAS was significantly associated with funding status of publications, journal impact factor and journal requirement on DASs. DASs appear infrequent in publications in journals indexed in the DOM category of JCR database. Funded studies published in journals which require a DAS and journals with a higher impact factor were more likely to contain a DAS than studies which were not funded and published in journals which do not require a DAS with a lower impact factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.