SynthesisThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026
The use of denosumab in rare bone diseases in adults: a systematic review from the ECTS Rare Bone Disease Action Group.
Synthesis in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The use of denosumab in rare bone diseases in adults: a systematic review from the ECTS Rare Bone Disease Action Group.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextRare bone diseases (RBDs) may display a disrupted RANKL-RANK-osteoprotegerin pathway causing increased osteoclastogenesis and enhanced bone resorption. Although bisphosphonates are commonly used, they often fall short of desired outcomes. Denosumab, an anti-RANKL antibody, provides a promising alternative by swiftly and strongly suppressing bone turnover (faster and more potent suppression of bone resorption than bisphosphonates), though its effects are reversible on discontinuation. The use of denosumab has been highlighted, especially in pediatric cases, but not substantially in adults. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A targeted evidence search was conducted to retrieve studies reporting denosumab use in RBDs in adults. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Denosumab administration may lead to pain reduction, lesion reduction, or bone formation. Treatment dosage, schedules, and duration varied, however, a dose of 120 mg dosed monthly or every 3 months for almost 1 year reached the desired treatment effect in most patients. Denosumab is generally well tolerated in adults, with mild common side effects such as (asymptomatic) hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia. Serious adverse effects such as osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femoral fractures are rarely reported. Main concerns regard rebound effect after denosumab discontinuation, with disease recurrence in some cases. Zoledronic acid after discontinuation of denosumab might be advisable, but is seldom reported.
conclusionDenosumab is a feasible treatment in adults with RBDs when managed by multidisciplinary teams with knowledge of both the underlying disease and potential surgeries as well as the medical site of treatment. Denosumab discontinuation management is paramount to prevent recurrence and severe complications. The paucity of data supports the need for data collection through rare disease registries for future pertinent evidence-based recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.