Trial reportJMIR human factors2026
Participant Engagement With a Digital Behavioral Health App for Chronic Pain: Descriptive Secondary Analysis of a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain is a widespread condition that impairs quality of life and is often managed primarily with medications. National guidelines now recommend nonpharmacologic, mind-and-body, and behavioral approaches as first-line or complementary treatments. However, access to these evidence-based options remains limited. Digital health technologies offer a scalable way to deliver integrative, self-care interventions that empower patients to live well with pain. Objective: This study examined engagement with and perceived usefulness of a patient- and health care professional-informed mobile app designed to deliver behavioral and educational content to support pain self-management. Methods: Adult primary care patients with chronic pain were enrolled in a 12-week feasibility trial. The app included lessons addressing the physical, emotional, and social aspects of pain; tracking and personalized insights; self-screenings; and optional in-app coaching. Participants completed baseline and 3-month surveys assessing usability and satisfaction. Engagement was evaluated through app analytics and milestone completion. Results: Of 49 patients assigned to the app, 40 (81.6%) activated it. Participants used the app for an average of 27.3 (SD 25.2) unique days and completed an average of 25.5 (SD 22.5) core lessons. Engagement highlights included 42.5% (17/40) completion of the valued living module, 25.0% (10/40) completion of all lessons, and 50.0% (20/40) use of daily check-ins. Usability ratings were high, with 86.7% (26/30) reporting that the app helped them better understand or manage their pain and 90.0% (27/30) recommending it to others. Conclusions: Adults with chronic pain engaged with the program and reported high satisfaction with this evidence-informed digital mind-and-body intervention. Findings from this feasibility study suggest the potential for digital tools to support access to nonpharmacologic, integrative pain self-care and complement traditional clinical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.