Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41955534›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2026

Exercise as a Biological Driver of Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Repair: Implications for Regenerative Rehabilitation.

Thomas A Rando

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas A RandoBroad Stem Cell Research Center.

Funding

Technology Development P2CHD086843 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AMBROSIO, FABRISIA · 2015 to 2024
$10.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Joel A. DeLisa Lecture on regenerative rehabilitation was presented by Dr Thomas Rando on February 27, 2025, at the Association of Academic Physiatrists Annual Scientific Meeting. This article follows the key themes presented in that lecture, exploring the regenerative potential of exercise as a biophysical stimulus and focusing on its ability to modulate muscle stem cell (MuSC) function and enhance tissue repair following muscle injury. In aged mice, exercise restores youthful properties to MuSCs, thereby enhancing regenerative capacity that declines with age. In models of volumetric muscle loss (VML), exercise improves the engraftment and integration of transplanted MuSCs by promoting myogenesis, angiogenesis, and reinnervation. In addition, exercise shifts systemic and local immune responses toward a pro-regenerative state, enhancing stem cell function across multiple tissues. Exercise acts as a potent, noninvasive regenerative intervention with direct effects on stem cell biology and tissue repair. These findings highlight the potential for integrating exercise-based rehabilitation with emerging biologic therapies in clinical practice, offering new strategies for improving recovery after injury. In this context, physiatrists and physical therapists will play a central role in the emerging field of regenerative rehabilitation.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyMuscle, SkeletalRegenerationAnimalsHumansMiceMuscle DevelopmentRegenerative MedicineStem CellsExerciseMuscleRegenerative RehabilitationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID41955534
PMCPMC13198226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.