ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2026
Harmonizing adapted interventions across contexts: lessons from harmonizing the World Health Organization's Caregiver Skills Training in Ethiopia and Kenya.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the increasing evidence on the importance of contextual adaptation of interventions, there is limited understanding of how intervention adaptations made for one context can inform adaptation and implementation efforts in others or how to harmonize adapted interventions for use across multiple contexts. PURPOSE: This paper outlines the process used to further adapt and harmonize previous Kenyan and Ethiopian cultural and contextual adaptations of the World Health Organization's Caregiver Skills Training intervention as a case study to propose a framework for similar efforts. It also outlines key lessons learned.
resultsThe Compare, Decide, Develop drafts, and Test and train (CoDDaT) framework is a four-phased, stepwise approach to intervention adaptation and harmonization that involves: (i) comparing available intervention materials and measures across contexts, (ii) deciding in collaboration with key stakeholders on adaptations needed, (iii) developing drafts of harmonized intervention materials and measures, and (iv) testing harmonized intervention materials and measures and training staff. It complements existing implementation frameworks by describing the preparatory phase ahead of implementing an adapted or harmonized project. Critical lessons learned included the importance of accurate documentation, the team's phase-specific size and composition, time management, and the opportunities for network growth and skills development offered by the harmonization process.
conclusionsWe demonstrate how lessons from context-specific adaptations can be applied cross-culturally, while incorporating critical revisions and preserving core intervention components. CoDDaT may inform efforts to adapt and implement interventions to promote health behavior change across contexts and advance the field by challenging interventionists to move beyond single-context-focused adaptations and consider applying adapted interventions to other similar contexts, harmonizing, or refining adapted interventions for more extensive use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.