Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41955448›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Rangatahi Youth-Led Dissemination Campaign for Cocreated Eating and Well-Being Guidelines: Process and Pilot Implementation Evaluation.

Layla Christison, Renee Railton, Rachael Glassey, Raun Makirere-Haerewa, David Tipene-Leach, Boyd Swinburn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Layla ChristisonTe Kura i Awarua Rangahau Maori Research Centre, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier City, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0009-7220-5842
Renee RailtonTe Kura i Awarua Rangahau Maori Research Centre, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier City, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0004-9820-0007
Rachael GlasseyTe Kura i Awarua Rangahau Maori Research Centre, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier City, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-7419
Raun Makirere-HaerewaTe Kura i Awarua Rangahau Maori Research Centre, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier City, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0004-0133-6582
David Tipene-LeachTe Kura i Awarua Rangahau Maori Research Centre, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier City, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2626-5248
Boyd SwinburnSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, 34 Princes Street, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand, 64 22-167-9636.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Youth should be partners in the development and dissemination of health information created for their demographic. The Manaora Rangatahi (youth) Guidelines comprise 10 eating and 10 wellbeing messages that were cocreated with rangatahi Māori (Māori youth) in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand, and then disseminated through a digital media campaign. Objective: This study aimed to present the process evaluation of the co-design and implementation of the pilot digital media dissemination campaign of the Manaora Rangatahi Guidelines. Methods: The 17 rangatahi who were involved in the cocreation of the guidelines codeveloped a dissemination plan, filmed video clips for each of the 20 messages, and supported the 20-week digital media campaign. The codevelopment process over 4 wānanga (workshops) is described and critiqued, and the implementation was assessed using the data analytics from Instagram and TikTok, the main social media platforms for dissemination. The rangatahi participated in a short postcampaign review survey. Results: The dissemination plan included a website for the messages, a campaign name and logo, apparel with messaging and QR codes, and the design of a digital media campaign featuring the participating rangatahi. Video clips of each of the guideline messages featuring the rangatahi were professionally developed with support from 3 Māori influencers and a video production company. The 10 phases of the campaign involved the release of 2 messages (one eating and one wellbeing) every fortnight over 20 weeks. Instagram and TikTok analytics showed that the campaign achieved >1.48 million impressions and >19,000 engagement actions (eg, likes, comments, and sharing). The mean engagement rate (Instagram 6.2%, TikTok 1.2%) was greater than or similar to the platforms' medians across all industries (0.36% and 1.73%, respectively). Various paid promotion strategies boosted the number of impressions, and paying one of the influencers to promote the messages in phase 8 created a more than 10-fold increase in impressions on Instagram. The estimated cost of the overall campaign was NZ $125,000 (US $72,500). The majority (about 60%) of rangatahi felt the campaign was successful and engaging. Conclusions: Rangatahi have expert knowledge in how to disseminate messages to their peers. They successfully co-designed and pilot-tested the implementation of a low-cost digital media campaign using peer-to-peer messaging and videos, which achieved substantial reach. The dissemination reach was good, but was significantly influenced by paid promotions. The cost per thousand impressions was equivalent to or better than much larger government-funded health promotion social media campaigns targeting youth. The development and dissemination of eating and well-being messages aimed at youth should ideally involve partnering with the target audience to enhance the relevance and reach of the messages. A well-funded dissemination campaign with paid promotions through influencers and digital platforms could expect to achieve substantial awareness of the messages.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicHealth PromotionInformation DisseminationAdolescentDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposureNew ZealandPilot Projectsdisseminationhealth advocacyhealth guidelinesrangatahisocial media campaignyouth co-designyouth-led campaign

Identifiers

PMID41955448
PMCPMC13064959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.