ArticleNeuro-oncology2026
Genomic characterization of aggressiveness in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAggressive evolution of PitNETs is rare; metastatic spread is even more. Defining aggressiveness and malignancy is challenging, subsequently hard to predict, and to understand. The aim was to provide a molecular definition of aggressiveness using genomic approaches.
methodsPitNETs from 206 patients were included. Associations between 9 clinicopathological features of aggressiveness and PitNETs' omics were explored. Omics included transcriptome, DNA methylation, chromosomal alterations, and mutations. Clonal tumor evolution was monitored in 7 patients.
resultsAmong the 9 clinicopathological features of aggressiveness, only rapid progression, progression after radiotherapy, Ki67/MIB1 proliferation index ≥10%, temozolomide treatment, metastases, and specific death were associated with specific omics signatures, while tumour maximal diameter ≥40 mm, cavernous, and sphenoid invasion were not. The omic signatures associated with these features of aggressiveness overlapped but remained distinct between corticotroph and mammo-somato-thyrotroph lineages. For each lineage, a common signature of aggressiveness was identified, associating a proliferative transcriptome signature and DNA hypermethylation. Alterations in specific genes were associated with aggressive features, including a novel PitNET gene, LRP1B, and known cancer genes (TP53, CDKN2A), while USP8 and GNAS alterations were not. Integration of gene alterations with methylome and transcriptome signatures isolated a subset of molecularly aggressive PitNETs. Molecular signatures were stable during the course of the disease, despite evolution toward aggressiveness and potential clonal divergence.
conclusionThis systematic analysis of clinicopathological features of aggressiveness using an integrated multiomic approach establishes a histomolecular definition of aggressiveness in PitNETs. Prospective cohort studies are needed to validate these molecular signatures and establish their prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.