ArticlePloS one2026
Full-day sleep pattern analysis in common mental disorders: Leveraging highly discrepant recordings from two consumer tracking devices.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep and circadian rhythm disruptions are increasingly studied through consumer sleep-tracking devices, both in research and in real-world contexts. These devices offer a unique perspective on mental health, given the strong connection between sleep disturbances and Common Mental Disorders (CMD). In this study, we sought to identify and characterize abnormal sleep behaviors by examining discrepancies between two complementary sleep-tracking devices. Rather than treating inter-device disagreement as measurement noise, we interpreted it as a potential behavioral signal. This approach uncovered six statistically robust outlier patterns in sleep health that were interpretable and clinically relevant. These patterns span a full 24-hour window-including nocturnal, diurnal, and peri-sleep activities-thus providing a holistic view of sleep-related behavior. We analyzed data from 149 patients (72% woman), ranging from 18 to 71 years old, and diagnosed with non-severe CMD over a period of three months. At the end, 4,824 days of sleep recordings were collected from two devices: a less accurate wristband tracker (W) and a more precise sleep-tracking mat (M). Using k-means clustering on high-discrepancy recordings (>5 hours), we identified six robust patterns of full-day sleep behavior that exhibited consistency at the individual user level, suggesting an origin in the patient's behavior rather than random noise. To further validate these clusters, we integrated additional behavioral metrics in the analysis such as daily step distribution or smartphone usage as indicators of physical or social activity. By leveraging device discrepancies, we revealed several sleep patterns of potential clinical relevance-indicative of oversleeping, unintended sleep onset outside the bed, or atypical sleep-wake cycles. These findings highlight the potential of passive sleep monitoring to support early detection of pathological changes (e.g., depressive episodes) and to inform clinical decisions by identifying behavioral side effects of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.