ArticlePloS one2026
Iterative usability testing of a digital joint protection program for people with hand osteoarthritis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand osteoarthritis is a leading cause of pain, disability, and reduced quality of life in older adults. Joint protection programs are recommended as a core component of self-management, but traditional delivery is limited by barriers to access. Digital programs can overcome these challenges for some people, but their reach and effectiveness depend on usability. We conducted a mixed methods usability study of a remotely delivered joint protection program designed for people with hand osteoarthritis. Twenty-three participants took part, recruited through purposeful sampling to ensure inclusion of groups often underrepresented in research. Usability was assessed using predefined task completion, browser-based eye-tracking, participant ratings, and think-aloud protocols, with iterative refinements applied between participants. Routine navigation tasks, such as navigating between different modules, accessing interactive activities, and viewing short videos, were consistently completed with high success. More complex interactive tasks, including drag-and-drop activities, scenario-based modules, and toggling videos to full screen, initially posed challenges. Over successive iterations, however, usability improved markedly, with later participants achieving near-perfect performance. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants valued clear language, short and focused videos, interactive elements, and the ability to proceed at their own pace, while raising concerns about excessive clicking, unclear instructions, and variation in age representation. Iterative refinements, including platform adjustments, clearer instructions and an introductory video, addressed these issues and contributed to improved performance. This study demonstrates that a remotely delivered, technology-enabled joint protection program for hand osteoarthritis is usable, accessible, and engaging across a diverse sample. Beyond refining the program itself, the study introduces a practical framework for iterative, equity-informed usability testing that can inform the design of future digital health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.