ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Challenges and responses of malaria elimination in a high-endemic area along the Thai-Myanmar border: A health systems perspective.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Challenges and responses of malaria elimination in a high-endemic area along the Thai-Myanmar border: A health systems perspective.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite Thailand's progress under the 1-3-7 malaria elimination framework, border districts such as Tha Song Yang in Tak Province continue to experience persistent transmission due to high population mobility, geographic constraints, and health system challenges. Understanding how local health systems respond to these pressures is critical for sustaining malaria elimination in complex border settings. This mixed-methods study applied the World Health Organization's Six Building Blocks framework to examine challenges and responses in malaria elimination in Tha Song Yang District. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with 24 key informants from district health offices, vector-borne disease units, malaria posts and clinics, hospitals, and local authorities. Quantitative data included household surveys assessing malaria-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (n = 388), and secondary surveillance data on adherence to the 1-3-7 strategy from 2018 to 2022. Adherence to Day 1 and Day 3 activities improved steadily, reaching 96% and 100%, respectively, while Day 7 adherence declined sharply to 69% in 2022. The household survey showed high levels of malaria knowledge (75.77%) and positive attitudes toward prevention (94.59%), indicating that community awareness was strong despite ongoing transmission. Qualitative findings highlighted a surge of short-term migrants, workforce shortages, reduced domestic funding, and logistical barriers in remote areas as key constraints, while adaptive local responses-including local flexibility, committed leadership, and the use of the Malaria Information System and mobile communication platforms-helped sustain malaria control and surveillance activities. These findings demonstrate that malaria persistence in border areas is driven primarily by systemic and operational challenges rather than gaps in community awareness. Strengthening malaria elimination in similar border settings requires resilient health systems with sustained domestic financing, adaptive surveillance strategies, effective use of digital tools, and governance arrangements that account for population mobility and cross-border complexity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.